RETHINKING MISSING PERSONS INVESTIGATIONS
SECRECY IN MISSING PERSONS INVESTIGATIONS HAS PROVEN TO BE AN ANTIQUATED AND FAILED MODEL TO SOLVE CASES
Rethinking Missing Persons Investigations: The Power of Information Sharing
I frequently find myself in disagreement with traditional investigators regarding information disclosure in missing person cases. My stance is firmly in favor of transparency, advocating for the timely release of information to the public. In today's world, dominated by Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) and real-time media, the old-school method of conducting missing persons investigations—marked by excessive secrecy and minimal public engagement—falls short. The proven effectiveness of public alert systems, such as AMBER Alerts, in rapidly and safely locating missing persons highlights the benefits of widespread information sharing. Therefore, I champion a paradigm shift towards a more open, community-engaged investigative approach that harnesses public involvement and the advantages of modern technology.
There are two distinctly different approaches to investigating a case:
The first approach is the traditional, secretive detective method. These detectives guard information zealously, often refusing collaboration with private investigators or even other law enforcement agencies and most certainly not with the public. Driven by ego, they treat investigations as personal projects. This method, common in missing persons cases, typically results in slow progress and has a notably poor success rate.
Contrastingly, the modern investigative era embraces openness and information sharing. Contrary to popular belief, many law enforcement agencies and even the FBI actively cooperate with private investigators. In my experience, daily collaborations with various agencies, including direct work with the FBI on missing persons cases, have demonstrated this. This approach, usually adopted by younger, tech-savvy detectives and special agents who are not hindered by ego, often leads to swift and effective resolutions of cases, as evidenced by the quick resolution of an abduction case I was involved in.
The Flaws in the Secrecy Approach
Delayed Investigations: Secrecy often results in slower investigations, providing perpetrators more time to harm the missing person.
Statistical Evidence Against Secrecy: The overwhelming success of public alert systems like AMBER Alerts in ensuring the safety and recovery of missing individuals contradicts the notion that secrecy is always necessary for successful investigations.
Case Studies Highlighting the Power of Information
Mariah Martinez: A Texas girl who had been missing for over a year was rescued after a viewer saw a segment on A&E’s "Live PD" detailing her abduction. The viewer's tip led police to Mariah's location, resulting in her safe recovery.
Bella Martinez: In Utah, Bella Martinez was rescued when a cupcake shop owner received an AMBER Alert on her phone and noticed the stolen vehicle in her shop's parking lot. Her prompt action led to Bella's safe return to her parents.
Rebecca Lewis: In Tennessee, a hospital employee recognized 4-year-old Rebecca Lewis from a Facebook post about her disappearance. Her alertness resulted in the capture of the abductor and Rebecca's reunion with her family.
8-Year-Old Girl in Fresno: An 8-year-old girl, abducted while playing in her front yard, was rescued by a local resident who had seen an AMBER Alert and later noticed the suspect’s vehicle. His decisive action led to the girl's safe recovery and the arrest of the kidnapper.
The Benefits of Public Involvement
Immediate Action and Community Resources: Public alerts and widespread dissemination of information mobilize community resources quickly, increasing the chances of locating missing individuals promptly.
Technological Leverage: Modern technology, including social media and digital tracking, significantly enhances the ability to trace and locate missing individuals.
Overcoming Challenges of Public Involvement
Managing Misinformation: Controlled and accurate information dissemination by authorities can mitigate the risk of misinformation.
Balancing Safety and Exposure: The concern for the missing person’s safety is valid, but the success of public alert systems in ensuring safety suggests that an open approach can be more beneficial.
Embracing Collaboration
Legal and Ethical Boundaries: Private investigators maintain client confidentiality and operate within legal limits, often conducting independent investigations parallel to law enforcement efforts.
Collaborative Efforts: Effective collaboration between law enforcement, private investigators, and community partners has led to improved processes and outcomes in certain cases, demonstrating the value of a multifaceted approach.
The traditional approach of maintaining secrecy in missing persons investigations is increasingly ineffective in today's fast-paced information era. This outdated method, still taught in academies and POST learning environments, contrasts sharply with the undeniable success of public alert systems like AMBER Alerts, Silver Alerts, and others. These alerts openly share critical details—suspect identities, vehicle types, travel directions—traditionally kept secret. The majority of these public alert cases are resolved within hours, usually with the safe recovery of the victim. This raises a crucial question: why continue to rely on a failed secretive approach when public awareness and shared knowledge have proven so effective?
The statistics strongly advocate for a more transparent method that utilizes public engagement and contemporary technology. Such a strategy not only improves the chances of safe recovery but also acts as a deterrent to potential criminals, thereby enhancing community safety and confidence in law enforcement.
The reluctance to adopt this change is likely rooted in ego and a resistance to embrace new ideas. Disruption is often the precursor to innovation, suggesting that a shift in mindset is essential for progress in missing persons investigations.
The shield of secrecy not only obscures outdated and ineffective investigative methods but also allows detectives to conceal their own shortcomings in advancing cases towards resolution. Embracing transparency reveals the true efficacy of investigators: it distinguishes those who can effectively solve cases from those who cannot. This clarity is not just about accountability; it is crucial for ensuring that investigations are conducted by those most capable of bringing them to a successful close. In the pursuit of justice and safety, transparency isn't just beneficial—it's imperative for the missing person.
STEVE FISCHER is a missing persons private investigator with fifteen missing persons found so far in 2023.
